Keywords
Legislación archivística
Criterios metodológicos archivísticos
Cuadros de clasificación
How to Cite
Abstract
Since the approval of important provisions on archival matters, public institutions in Mexico have the obligation to design their own documentary tools. When reviewing the archival theory, it is verified that this science has a methodology that contributes to the correct organization of archives. However, in practice, the methodological criteria that have been implemented are diverse due to lack of homogenization as established by law. This, despite the fact that the General Archive of the Nation formulated an Instruction to build classification tables. Derived from the above, this research establishes three methodological criteria to design classification tables. The aspects proposed have a theoretical basis in archiving.
The first criterion, the study of the institution and its functions through the identification of the administrative procedures it executes, based on the regulations that give it legal support as an organism. The second criterion, the principle of provenance, the archival scientific element on which the classification process is based. And, the third, the study of the background of the producing institution, to know the administrative context in which the documents that make up the archive have been generated.
References
Alberch Fugueras, Ramon. 2003. Los archivos, entre la memoria histórica y la sociedad del conocimiento. Barcelona: UOC.
Archivo General de la Nación. 2012. Instructivo para elaborar el Cuadro General de Clasificación Archivística. México: AGN. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/326907/instructivoCuadroClasificacion06072012.pdf
Cook, Terry. 2001. “Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations for Old Concepts”. Archival Science 1 (1): 3-24.
Cruz Mundet, José Ramón. 1994. Manual de archivística. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez.
Duchein, Michel. 1986. “El respeto de los fondos en archivística: principios teóricos y problemas prácticos”. En La administración moderna de archivos y la gestión de documentos: el prontuario RAMP, 69-92.
Foscarini, Fiorella. 2009. Function-based records classification system. An exploratory study of records management practices in Central Banks. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.
Heredia Herrera, Antonia. 1983. “Archivos municipales, teoría y práctica”. Boletín de la ANABAD 3: 475-480. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/964746.pdf
Heredia Herrera, Antonia. 1991. Archivística general. Teoría y práctica. Sevilla: Diputación Provincial de Sevilla.
Heredia Herrera, Antonia. 2012. “¿Permanencia, renovación, invención, desvirtuación de conceptos archivísticos?”. Legajos. Boletín del Archivo General de la Nación 7 (11): 107-124. https://bagn.archivos.gob.mx/index.php/legajos/article/view/423
Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. 2016. México: Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LFTAIP_200521.pdf
Ley General de Archivos. 2018. México: Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGA_150618.pdf
Mendo Carmona, Concepción. 1995. “El largo camino de la Archivística: de práctica a ciencia”. Signo. Revista de Historia de la Cultura Escrita, no. 2, 113-132. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58907841.pdf
Mendo Carmona, Concepción. 2004. “Consideraciones sobre el método en Archivística”. Documenta & Instrumenta, no. 1, 35-46. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DOCU/article/view/DOCU0404110035A
Reyes Olvera, Guadalupe Mireya. 2020. “Modelo teórico de cuadro de clasificación para archivos municipales en México”. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.
Sabourin, Paul. 2001. “Constructing a Function-Based Records Classification System: Business Activity Structure Classification System”. Archivaria 51: 137-54. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12797
Schellenberg, Theodore R. 1979. Principios archivísticos de ordenación. México: AGN.
Schellenberg, Theodore R. 1987. Archivos modernos. Principios y técnicas. México: AGN.
Villanueva Bazán, Gustavo. 2011. “El acceso a los archivos: entre lo público y lo privado, entre la apertura y la opacidad”. Legajos. Boletín del Archivo General de la Nación 7 (7): 87-102. https://bagn.archivos.gob.mx/index.php/legajos/article/view/358
Authors:
- They must sent the publication authorization letter to Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
- They can share the submission with the scientific community in the following ways:
- As teaching support material
- As the basis for lectures in academic conferences
- Self-archiving in academic repositories.
- Dissemination in academic networks.
- Posting to author’s blogs and personal websites
These allowances shall remain in effect as long as the conditions of use of the contents of the journal are duly observed pursuant to the Creative Commons:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license that it holds. DOI links for download the full text of published papers are provided for the last three uses.
Self-archiving policy
For self-archiving, authors must comply with the following
a) Acknowledge the copyright held by the journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
b) Establish a link to the original version of the paper on the journal page, using, for example, the DOI.
c) Disseminate the final version published in the journal.
Licensing of contents
The journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información allows access and use of its contents pursuant to the Creative Commons license: Attribution- Non-commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.
Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib.
This means that contents can only be read and shared as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and cited. The work shall not be exploited for commercial ends nor shall it been modified.
Limitation of liability
The journal is not liable for academic fraud or plagiarism committed by authors, nor for the intellectual criteria they employ. Similarly, the journal shall not be liable for the services offered through third party hyperlinks contained in papers submitted by authors.
In support of this position, the journal provides the Author’s Duties notice at the following link: Responsibilities of authors.
The director or editor of the journal shall notify authors in the event it migrates the contents of the journal’s official website to a distinct IP or domain.