Abstract
This study focuses on the analysis of bibliographic productivity on the history and evolution of American librarianship from a gender perspective. From its beginnings, this discipline became a feminised profession in which women librarians played a fundamental role in its definition and consolidation. But as the sector became more professionalised, they lost representation and economic power, occupying positions of lesser responsibility and lower salaries. As a methodology, bibliographic research has been carried out in two databases (LISA, JSTOR) and an analysis and selection of the bibliographic production focusing on the relevance and number of publications. The results show an extensive bibliographic corpus starting in the 1970s, with its epicentre in the 1980s-90s. Many studies relate the discrediting of the profession to its feminisation. Despite the fact that female participation was key in the establishment and formation of the discipline, women librarians suffered a progressive loss of status during the professionalisation of the sector. The limitations generated by gender status frustrated many careers and librarianship is an example of the contradictions of this feminisation.
References
Brand, Barbara Elizabeth. 1983. “Sex-Typing in Education for Librarianship: 1870-1920”. En The Status of Women in Librarianship: Historical, Sociological, and Economic Issues, editado por Kathleen M. Heim, 29-49. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Carmichael, James V. 1986. “Atlanta’s Female Librarians, 1883-1915”. The Journal of Library History (1974-1987) 21 (2): 376-99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25541702
Fairchild, Salome Cutler. 1904. “Women in American Libraries”. Library Journal 29: 157-62.
Garrison, Dee. 1972. “The Tender Technicians: The Feminization of Public Librarianship, 1876-1905”. Journal of Social History 6 (2): 131-59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3786606
Garrison, Dee. 1979. Apostles of Culture: The Public Librarian and American Society, 1876- 1920. University of Wisconsin Press.
Grotzinger, Laurel. 1983. “Biographical Research: Recognition Denied”. The Journal of Library History (1974-1987) 18 (4): 372-81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25541453
Harris, Roma M. 1986. “Career Aspirations of M.L. Students: Yes, the Women Are as Ambitious as the Men”. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 27 (1): 31-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323435
Harris, Roma M. 1992a. Librarianship: The Erosion of a Woman’s Profession. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Harris, Roma M. 1992b. “Information Technology and the De-Skilling of Librarians”. Computers in Libraries 12 (1): 8-10.
Harris, Roma M. 1999. “Gender and Technology Relations in Librarianship”. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 40 (4): 232-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324095
Harris, Roma M., B. Gillian Michell y Carol Cooley. 1985. “The Gender Gap in Library Education”. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 25 (3): 167-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323104
Heim, Kathleen M. 1983. The Status of Women in Librarianship: Historical, Sociological, and Economic Issues. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Heim, Kathleen M. 1985. “Determinants of Gender Stratification in the Library Profession”. En Nos ressources humaines, la clé d´un bon service / Personnel: Key to Successful Public Service, editado por Réjean Savard, 31-42. Corporation des Bibliothécaires Professionnels du Québec.
Heim, Kathleen M., y Leigh S. Estabrook. 1983. Career Profiles and Sex Discrimination in the Library Profession. American Library Association.
Hildenbrand, Suzanne. 1983. “Revision Versus Reality: Women in the History of the Public Library Movement, 1876-1920”. En The Status of Women in Librarianship: Historical, Sociological, and Economic Issues, editado por Kathleen M. Heim. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Hildenbrand, Suzanne. 1996. Reclaiming the American Library Past: Writing the Women in. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Maack, Mary Niles. 1982. “Toward a History of Women in Librarianship: A Critical Analysis with Suggestions for Further Research”. The Journal of Library History (1974-1987) 17 (2): 164-85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25541260
Maack, Mary Niles. 1998. “Gender, Culture, and the Transformation of American Librarianship, 1890-1920”. Libraries and Culture 33 (1): 51-61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25548597
O’Brien, Patricia Nancy. 1983. “The Recruitment of Men into Librarianship Following World War II”. En The Status of Women in Librarianship: Historical, Sociological, and Economic Issues, editado por Kathleen M. Heim, 51-66. Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1978. “Sexual Segregation in the Sciences: Some Data and a Model”. Signs 4 (1): 146-51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3173331
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1982. Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. John Hopkins University Press.
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1986. “Women and the History of Scientific Communication”. The Journal of Library History (1974-1987) 21 (1): 39-59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25541679
Schiller, Anita R. 1964. “A Survey of Salary Surveys”. ALA Bulletin 58 (4): 279-86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25696901
Schiller, Anita R. 1970. “The Disadvantaged Majority: Women Employed in Libraries”. American Libraries 1 (4): 345-49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25617879
Tilly, Louise A., y Joan Wallach Scott. 2016. Women, Work, and Family. Routledge.
Wiegand, Wayne A. 1981. “American Library Association Executive Board Members, 1876-1917: A Collective Profile”. Libri 31 (2): 153-66. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.153
Williamson, Charles C. 1921. Training for Library Work: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Advisory Committee: Herbert Putnam, JH Kirkland, and Wilson Ferrand.
Williamson, Charles C. 1923. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Merrymount Press. https://archive.org/details/trainingforlibra011790mbp/page/n9/mode/2up
Authors:
- They must sent the publication authorization letter to Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
- They can share the submission with the scientific community in the following ways:
- As teaching support material
- As the basis for lectures in academic conferences
- Self-archiving in academic repositories.
- Dissemination in academic networks.
- Posting to author’s blogs and personal websites
These allowances shall remain in effect as long as the conditions of use of the contents of the journal are duly observed pursuant to the Creative Commons:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license that it holds. DOI links for download the full text of published papers are provided for the last three uses.
Self-archiving policy
For self-archiving, authors must comply with the following
a) Acknowledge the copyright held by the journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
b) Establish a link to the original version of the paper on the journal page, using, for example, the DOI.
c) Disseminate the final version published in the journal.
Licensing of contents
The journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información allows access and use of its contents pursuant to the Creative Commons license: Attribution- Non-commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.

Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib.
This means that contents can only be read and shared as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and cited. The work shall not be exploited for commercial ends nor shall it been modified.
Limitation of liability
The journal is not liable for academic fraud or plagiarism committed by authors, nor for the intellectual criteria they employ. Similarly, the journal shall not be liable for the services offered through third party hyperlinks contained in papers submitted by authors.
In support of this position, the journal provides the Author’s Duties notice at the following link: Responsibilities of authors.
The director or editor of the journal shall notify authors in the event it migrates the contents of the journal’s official website to a distinct IP or domain.

