Keywords
Open Scientific Knowledge
Social Agents Open Participation
Open Dialogue with Other Knowledge Systems
How to Cite
Abstract
This article analyzes the predominant open science practices in Colombian humanistic institutions most recurred by researchers, under the premise that this way of doing science encompasses the sense of knowledge as a common good. A questionnaire was designed and answered by 173 researchers of the humanities field; results highlight that the most used practices of open participation by different social actors are the exchange and co-creation between researchers and citizens for research project development (46 %) and the recognition of participation and contribution of social actors in research results (44 %). In the open dialogue with other knowledge systems, results featured the valuing of ancestral and traditional knowledge of Indigenous, Black, Afro-Colombian, Raizal, Palenquero, Rom, peasant and local communities (40 %), as well as for their knowledge systems (30 %). Further, there were no obstacles perceived for open science implementation. In conclusion, the article endorses competency strengthening in this group of researchers for a much more situated and intentional use of technology, guided by the principles of open knowledge, collaboration and inclusion.
References
Abadal, Ernest, y Anglada, Lluís. 2020. “Ciencia abierta: cómo han evolucionado la denominación y el concepto”. Anales de Documentación 23 (1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.378171
Anglada, Lluís, y Ernest Abadal. 2018. “¿Qué es la ciencia abierta?”. Anuario ThinkEPI, 12: 292-98. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2018.43
Bartling, Sönke, y Sascha Friesike. 2014. “Towards Another Scientific Revolution”. En Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, editado por Sönke Bartling y Sascha Friesike, 3-16. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1
Bowman, Nicholas David, y Justin Robert Keene. 2018. “A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices”. Communication Research Reports 35 (4): 363-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273
Caldera-Serrano, Jorge. 2018. “Repositorios públicos frente a la mercantilización de la ciencia: apostando por la ciencia abierta y la evaluación cualitativa”. Métodos de Información 9 (17): 74-101. https://doi.org/10.5557/IIMEI9-N17-074101
Gezelter, Dan. 2011. “An Informal Definition of OpenScience”. The OpenScience Project(blog). 28 de julio de 2011. https://openscience.org/an-informal-definition-of-openscience/
Hey, Tony, y Anne Trefethen. 2002. “The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid”. Future Generation Computer Systems 18 (2): 1017-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(02)00082-1
Masuzzo, Paola, y Lennart Martens. 2017. “Do You Speak Open Science? Resources and Tips to Learn the Language”. Prepublicación PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2689v1
Méndez, Eva. 2021. “Open science por defecto. La nueva normalidad para la investigación”. Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 197 (799): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799002
Merton, Robert King. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. Nueva York: The Free Press.
Merton, Robert King. 1973. The Sociolog y of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. El gobierno de los bienes comunes. La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. 2ª ed. Traducido por Leticia Merino Pérez. México, Distrito Federal: Fondo de Cultura Económica; Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales - Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Unesco (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2021. Ciencia abierta. Recomendación de la Unesco sobre la ciencia abierta. París: Organización de la Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_spa
Unesco. 2023. Open Science Outlook 1: Status and Trends around the World. París: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387324
Vallejo Sierra, Ruth Helena. 2023. “Prácticas de apertura del conocimiento utilizadas por los científicos colombianos en el proceso de investigación”. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 29 (7): 305-26. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i.40466
Authors:
- They must sent the publication authorization letter to Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
- They can share the submission with the scientific community in the following ways:
- As teaching support material
- As the basis for lectures in academic conferences
- Self-archiving in academic repositories.
- Dissemination in academic networks.
- Posting to author’s blogs and personal websites
These allowances shall remain in effect as long as the conditions of use of the contents of the journal are duly observed pursuant to the Creative Commons:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license that it holds. DOI links for download the full text of published papers are provided for the last three uses.
Self-archiving policy
For self-archiving, authors must comply with the following
a) Acknowledge the copyright held by the journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
b) Establish a link to the original version of the paper on the journal page, using, for example, the DOI.
c) Disseminate the final version published in the journal.
Licensing of contents
The journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información allows access and use of its contents pursuant to the Creative Commons license: Attribution- Non-commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.
Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib.
This means that contents can only be read and shared as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and cited. The work shall not be exploited for commercial ends nor shall it been modified.
Limitation of liability
The journal is not liable for academic fraud or plagiarism committed by authors, nor for the intellectual criteria they employ. Similarly, the journal shall not be liable for the services offered through third party hyperlinks contained in papers submitted by authors.
In support of this position, the journal provides the Author’s Duties notice at the following link: Responsibilities of authors.
The director or editor of the journal shall notify authors in the event it migrates the contents of the journal’s official website to a distinct IP or domain.