Keywords
Polyrepresentation
Digital Images
Cultural Heritage
Europeana Image Classification Pilot
How to Cite
Abstract
Digital images of cultural heritage can be understood as representations of elements from the real world, which, taken as digital objects, become a means of capturing the different forms of interpretation that such elements, as representatives of ideas, values, and knowledge, aim to convey. This perspective is in line with the principle of polyrepresentation, which by suggesting the cognitive overlap of representative aspects, provides conditions to strengthen the semantics of digital objects. Therefore, the objective of this work is to discuss the potential of cultural heritage images as digital objects, using the perspective of polyrepresentation. Based on an exploratory-descriptive, qualitative and bibliographical study, and review of the Europeana Image classification pilot project, the results highlight that cultural heritage digital images, when treated as digital objects, can be represented in different configurations depending on the context, under a modular and granular character that provide conditions for these images to be interpreted at different levels of interaction.
References
Agustín Lacruz, María del Carmen. 2010. “El contenido de las imágenes y su análisis en entornos documentales”. Em Polisemias visuales: aproximaciones a la alfabetización visual en la sociedad intercultural, organizado por Raquel Gómez Díaz e María del Carmen Agustín Lacruz, 85-116. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. http://eprints.rclis.org/15921/
Barreto, Juliano Serra. 2007. “Desafios a avanços na recuperação automática da informação audiovisual”. Ciência da Informação 36 (3): 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-19652007000300003
Cejudo Grano de Oro, José Eduardo. 2023a. “Concluding the Europeana Image Classification Pilot”. Europeana Pro, 6 de novembro, 2023. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/concluding-the-europeana-image-classification-pilot
Cejudo Grano de Oro, José Eduardo. 2023b. “Training Our Image Classification Model”. Europeana Pro, 6 de novembro, 2023. https://pro.europeana.eu/post/training-our-image-classification-model
Dodebei, Vera. 2006. “Patrimônio e memória digital”. Revista Morpheus: Estudos Interdisciplinares em Memória Social 5 (8). http://seer.unirio.br/morpheus/article/view/4759
Europeana Pro. s.d.a. “Europeana Annotations API (Alpha)”. Acessado em 16 de fevereiro, 2024. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/annotations
Europeana Pro. s.d.b. “Issue 5: Annotations”. Acessado em 16 de fevereiro, 2024. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/issue-5-annotations
Higgins, Sarah. 2008. “The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model”. International Journal of Digital Curation 3 (1): 134-40. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
Hui, Yuk. 2012. “What Is a Digital Object?”. Metaphilosophy 43 (4): 380-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
Ingwersen, Peter. 1992. “Information and Information Science in Context”. Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies 42 (2): 99-135. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.99
Ingwersen, Peter. 1996. “Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory”. Journal of Documentation 52 (1): 3-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026960
Ingwersen, Peter, e Kalervo Järvelin. 2005. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Nova Iorque: Springer.
Kaldeli, Eirini, Orfeas Menis-Mastromichalakis, Spyros Bekiaris, Maria Ralli, Vassilis Tzouvaras e Giorgos Stamou. 2021. “CrowdHeritage: Crowdsourcing for Improving the Quality of Cultural Heritage Metadata”. Information 12 (2): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020064
Kallinikos, Jannis, Aleksi Aaltonen e Attila Marton. 2010. “A Theory of Digital Objects”. First Monday 15 (6/7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i6.3033
Larsen, Birger. 2005. “Practical Implications of Handling Multiple Contexts in the Principle of Polyrepresentation”. Em Context: Nature, Impact, and Role. 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005, Proceedings, organizado por Fabio Crestani e Ian Ruthven, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/11495222_4
Larsen, Birger, Peter Ingwersen e Jaana Kekäläinen. 2006. “The Polyrepresentation Continuum in IR”. Em IIiX: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Interaction in Context, organizado por Ian Ruthven, Pia Borlund, Peter Ingwersen, Nicholas Belkin, Anastasios Tombros e Pertti Vakkari, 88-96. Nova Iorque: Association for Computing Machinery Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1164820.1164840
Lima, Gercina Ângela de. 2020. “Organizaçã o e representaçã o do conhecimento e da informaçã o na web: teorias e técnicas”. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informaçã o 25 (especial): 57-97. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/22283
Melgar Estrada, Liliana María. 2016. “From Social Tagging to Polyrepresentation: A Study of Expert Annotating Behavior of Moving Images”. Tese de doutorado, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/dctes?codigo=74555
Mota, Denysson Axel Ribeiro, e Nair Yumiko Kobashi. 2016. “Web semântica e web pragmática: discussão crítica sobre versionamento na web e limites conceituais”. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação 9 (2): 1-18. http://revistas.ancib.org/index.php/tpbci/article/view/407
Panofsky, Erwin. 1983. Meaning in the Visual Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Queiroz, José Eustáquio Rangel de, e Herman Martins Gomes. 2006. “Introdução ao processamento digital de imagens”. Revista de Informática Teórica e Aplicada - RITA 13 (2): 11-42. http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br/~hmg/disciplinas/graduacao/vc-2016.2/Rita-Tutorial-PDI.pdf
Roa-Martínez, Sandra Milena. 2019. “Da Information Findability à Image Findability: aportes da polirrepresentação, recuperação e comportamento de busca”. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/182465
Simionato, Ana Carolina. 2015. “Modelagem conceitual DILAM: princípios descritivos de arquivos, bibliotecas e museus para o recurso imagético digital”. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/123318
Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tardy, Cécile, e Vera Dodebei. 2015. Memória e novos patrimônios. Marselha: OpenEdition Press.
Terras, Melissa. 2016. Digital Images for the Information Professional. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wang, Xiaoguang, Ningyuan Song, Xuemei Liu e Lei Xu. 2021. “Data Modeling and Evaluation of Deep Semantic Annotation for Cultural Heritage Images”. Journal of Documentation 77 (4): 906-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2020-0102
Wittenburg, Peter, George Strawn, Barend Mons, Luiz Boninho e Erik Schultes. 2019. “Digital Objects as Drivers towards Convergence in Data Infrastructures”. B2SHARE. https://doi.org/10.23728/b2share.b605d85809ca45679b110719b6c6cb11
Zeng, Marcia Lei. 2019. “Semantic Enrichment for Enhancing LAM Data and Supporting Digital Humanities. Review Article”. Profesional de la Información 28 (1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.03
Authors:
- They must sent the publication authorization letter to Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
- They can share the submission with the scientific community in the following ways:
- As teaching support material
- As the basis for lectures in academic conferences
- Self-archiving in academic repositories.
- Dissemination in academic networks.
- Posting to author’s blogs and personal websites
These allowances shall remain in effect as long as the conditions of use of the contents of the journal are duly observed pursuant to the Creative Commons:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license that it holds. DOI links for download the full text of published papers are provided for the last three uses.
Self-archiving policy
For self-archiving, authors must comply with the following
a) Acknowledge the copyright held by the journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información.
b) Establish a link to the original version of the paper on the journal page, using, for example, the DOI.
c) Disseminate the final version published in the journal.
Licensing of contents
The journal Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información allows access and use of its contents pursuant to the Creative Commons license: Attribution- Non-commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.
Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib.
This means that contents can only be read and shared as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and cited. The work shall not be exploited for commercial ends nor shall it been modified.
Limitation of liability
The journal is not liable for academic fraud or plagiarism committed by authors, nor for the intellectual criteria they employ. Similarly, the journal shall not be liable for the services offered through third party hyperlinks contained in papers submitted by authors.
In support of this position, the journal provides the Author’s Duties notice at the following link: Responsibilities of authors.
The director or editor of the journal shall notify authors in the event it migrates the contents of the journal’s official website to a distinct IP or domain.